Home > Main Blog - General > A Clever PUMA? HuffingtonPost Promoting a Hate Site Fanatic

A Clever PUMA? HuffingtonPost Promoting a Hate Site Fanatic

You would think that an administration that passed as its first Act, the Ledbetter Bill, appointed more women to a first pick Cabinet than any other President, would hardly be attacked because the President did not play basketball with them. Unless you read the Onion. This attack is not on the Onion, it is on The Huffington Post, in a thinly disguised article selling hate.

We all remember the stupidity and racism of the PUMA “movement”. Hate, racism and what they considered “revenge” was their agenda. Thankfully, most of them were so idiotic that they could not run a whelk stall.

I remember the scene in Starship Troopers quite well, when a talking head dismisses the idea of a brain bug out of hand. Amy Siskind is a brain PUMA.

Not all PUMAs are as idiotic as Darra$h Murphy. Her extreme racist agenda is out there for all to see. Siskind is different. The most dangerous form of racist is a racist with a brain. They sell their hate and bigotry by manipulation.

Amy Siskind is no laughing matter. She has an old agenda to sell, hate, wrapped up in one shiny happy package.

The Real New Agenda

To Siskind, crimes against women are only committed by members or supporters of the Democratic Party or by ethnic minorities and for her agenda, preferably both. Not once has she mentioned the assassination of Dr Tiller, a crime against all women, Letterman was more important. She has never once mentioned the wife beating dished out by Republican Dave Weller?

The assault by Chris Brown on Rihanna, according to Siskind, should have required a Presidential explanation.

Do women count so little to Siskind that she trades the real issues that impact them for her revenge against what she considers to be Obama campaign sexism against Hillary and Sarah?

When it comes to the achievements of President Obama on womens issues, Siskind is either silent, spreading mistruths or being deliberately manipulative.

The first Cabinet pick by President Obama has more women in it than any other President, he picked Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and Judge Sotomayor for the Supreme Court. She claims women are not supported by this President, because they do not play basketball with him. This was the whole basis of her article on Huffington Post. As a poster there said, it should have been on the Onion.

On the appointment of Valerie Jarrett, Siskind claim she defended her appointment, but she opens using every smear the right put out about her, using a common “some say” method of smearing.

On Ledbetter, it took the New Agenda the best part of six months to say nothing worth saying anyway.

Issues of race are completely irrelevant to The New Agenda. Never mind that minority women are impacted more by racism than men. No, women of colour should just go elsewhere. The New Agenda will not tackle racism.

She declares:

In reading our blog, we seem to hitting against a new issue – the issue of racism. I would make the same request of our viewers. There are many wonderful national organization devoted to speaking out against racism. For those of you that find your life impacted by the color of your skin, you will probably prefer to join organizations which are devoted to that important issue.

As a result of her association with race hate, when she tried to claim credit for the internal election results of a NOW, Diana Castaneda , of the NOW Combatting Racism Task Force, made it clear – The New Agenda can get lost.

Diana Castaneda on June 30th, 2009 6:52 pm

You cannot claim A COUP, when all the work to give NOW new life came directly from NOW Feminist like me, that have never heard of the NEW Agenda. The fact that a very few of you attended does not make a coup! I am a National Board member from Texas. The first I have ever heard of you was from a NOW President,.We are not new agenda/Palin supporters. We support candidates and women that adhere to choice . We also do not condone Letterman or any one that promotes misogyny and abuse of women either in Word or Deed. I for one supported Terry O’Neill because she is the most qualified to take on the Fiscal challenges that NOW is facing. In this country there is room for all concepts of inclusion including the NEW AGENDA, but NOW is NOT RIPE for the picking! YOU, will have to do your own joint collaborations with other Legitimate groups to build a network just as NOW has in over 40 years. No coup was masterminded by the New Agenda, it was the membership that wanted a new direction. NOW is happy to have people that support our AGENDA, and inclusion of All women , and Women of Color. Diana Castaneda, South Central Region, Texas/Combating Racism Task Force Member

Race hate is not welcomed by NOW. NOW fights against it. The New Palin Agenda, considers issues of racism irrelevant. That says a lot about The Real Agenda offered by Siskind.

She has called NoQuarter, good friends of the New Agenda and has them on her blog roll.

These are her good friends

Comment by Hadrianus | 2009-10-15 19:06:15

Yes, he has a problem with women. He’s gay! Look at the drag queen he married.

Comment by Mairi | 2009-10-16 23:27:33

Think about it….Meesh is as “manly” as they come! There isn’t a “feminine” bone in her body IMHO. It’s really sad. We have had some tremendously WONDERFUL First Ladies, but I don’t think this one will EVER make that list….not even last. When we DO have a female Prez, she MAY make the list of “First Dudes”, but my guess would be that she would be last on THAT list! Just sayin’…….guess I am no longer “classy” either when it comes to evaluating this sidekick.

Comment by Not suprised | 2009-10-15 22:28:45

Culturally, Obama can’t have a woman around when his wife is not around. If the woman was a friend of Michelle’s she could be around but only if Michelle was present. Ask any woman in a Black community. Standard behavior.

Just some of the classy comments there. Does anyone call them out? Not a chance.

Is this the first time NoQuarter displays such hatred and sexism against women? Nope, of course not.

It is worth remembering even Harriet Christian called Siskind out. Christian was not the right type of woman wanted by the New Palin Agenda.

Huffington Post should not be pretending that Amy Siskind is a Democratic woman upset with the progress on issues that matter to Women. She is not. She is a Republican tool, being used to sell the Republican Party to women. That is The New Agenda. She needs to be called out for it continuously.

This is your chance to object email HuffPo.


(Adapted from an article of mine at StupidPUMAs.com)

Categories: Main Blog - General
  1. November 8, 2009 at 6:19 am

    Why do you hate women so much?


    • thebigotbasher
      November 8, 2009 at 11:01 pm

      Why do you hate people who are not white Christians?

      • November 9, 2009 at 1:22 am

        That is not a credible response. There is more disrespecting of women going on than any type of racism. I don’t expect you to review all of my columns, but I think I have written several articles that give clear examples of how women get minimized in the media.

    • November 14, 2009 at 9:26 pm

      and I bet some of your best friends are women too.

  2. thebigotbasher
    November 13, 2009 at 2:42 am

    Actually it is a credible response. PUMA hypocrisy is second to none.

    PUMAs fight sexism


    PUMAs fight homophobia and racism


    PUMAs fight Islamaphobia


    In other words PUMAs are sick hypocritical bigots. PUMAs are not interested in fighting for anything, they just want to fight Obama, simply because he won and Hillary lost.

  3. November 13, 2009 at 4:50 am

    You are taking these posts as if they were generated out of thin air. I did not create the posts nor are they from my site but I believe they are response posts to having to deal with a bought out media that refused to vet Barack Obama’s 80’s and 90’s.

    Did Barack Obama choose to fly to Bali to finish writing his first book about his sperm donor dad while his mother was dying of cancer in a Hawaii Hospital? Is it fair to not vet this out when Barack Obama chooses to then mention his own mothers fight with cancer during the campaign to gain sympathy?

    Barack Obama got to have it both ways. He avoided scrutiny about how close he was to his mother during her dying days, yet he most definitely brought her situation for political gain. Once Barack Obama brought it up for fair gain, he should have been fair game for vetting in regards to what he prioritized, his book, or his mother.

    The same thing with Michigan. Barack Obama purposely waited until the final day to take his name off the ballot, then he went around Iowa commiserating with Iowans over Michigan’s attempt to usurp Iowa as the first state that votes and how some candidates had refused to take their name off the ballot.

    I actually don’t mind that aspect of using Michigan to gain in Iowa, what I did mind was the crying and pouting about Michigan counting after using Michigan to make gains in Iowa. Michigan becomes fair game the moment you use it to gain in Iowa. If you don’t want Michigan to count, DON’T MENTION MICHIGAN when you are in Iowa.

    Barack Obama surreptitiously took his name off of the Michigan ballot, at the last minute, now man up and accept that as part of your strategy to get off to a fast start in Iowa. No harm would have come to Barack Obama if he had kept his name on the ballot in Michigan, other than it would have exposed his weakness in the bigger states and he could not have buddied up to Iowans.

    Barack Obama has used shenanigans in virtually every race he has ever been in, to win. Going all the way back to Alice Walker and on down the line, contesting signatures on ballots if they had even the slightest difference between the printed version and the written version.

    The problem with winning in this matter is after the win, then what? Not much actually, but just keep moving up if you can, even if it is via shenanigans every step of the way.

    • thebigotbasher
      November 13, 2009 at 10:08 pm

      Wow thank you for proving yourself to be truly PUMA in every way. If ever you were a Democrat you should be ashamed of that post. Really. Just re-read it.

      You do know his father died in a car accident?

      Did anyone question the parentage of Hillary Clinton? No and you sick hypocritical low lives would have been al over them. PUMAs however are only too happy to to sink to levels lower than even the Freepers would when it comes to Obama, his mother,his family or as now, his father.

      As for Michigan – Obama did not “surreptitiously” take his name off the ballot, he took his name off the ballot as did Edwards. Clinton of course said it doesn’t matter as the votes would notcount. She said that when she thought she would win. When she was losing it of course became a different matter. She wanted the rules, her campaign team effectively wrote, re-written. Of course you care nothing about that.

      The Primaries are long gonbe. We have a Democratic President. The Primaries worth worrying about are those for the House and Senate to secure better Democratic candidates, who are not blue dogs. PUMAs just want stupid Rethugs.

      Anyway, I have debunked most of your silly comments here


      Ages ago.

      I am proud of having supported Barack Obama, when people were telling me, Hillary would win and that if he did win the Primaries he would never be elected.

      Are you proud of having spent the last 2 years being nothing more than a hater promoting far right talking points? Including the far right Lionheart site.

      • November 14, 2009 at 2:28 am

        Obama took his name off the ballot within the final 24 hours it could be done. That was planned.

        Lionheart is not a PUMA blog. It is listed next to many other blogs on the opposite side of where the PUMA blogs reside.

        I have not read it enough to know their exact slant on things.

    • November 14, 2009 at 8:53 am

      For the record, it was Alice Palmer, not Alice Walker.

      • thebigotbasher
        November 14, 2009 at 4:55 pm

        If you do not read Lionheart – why is it on your blogroll? Aren’t you supposed to read entries on your blogroll? It is after all a list of blogs you read.

        • November 14, 2009 at 5:57 pm

          Now now, Kerry is not an idiot.

          • thebigotbasher
            November 14, 2009 at 10:57 pm

            No but you admit to being a PUMA, which to me is a group with entirely the opposite levels of qualification as MENSA.

      • November 14, 2009 at 9:34 pm

        I don’t have time to keep up on all the blogs. I did notice one lionheart post that I found controversial. However, as long as they accept comments and rebuttal there is worse out there.

        I took Lame Cherry off of DailyPUMA after they ran a picture of Obama’s Kids with some awful headline underneath it. I think I know why Lame Cherry did it, it was because Palin and her kids were under scrutiny, however, Lame Cherry does not allow any email contact or comment responses, so took them off.

        There are a couple other as well.

        At the end of the day, Barack Obama is in cahoots with the banks.

  4. November 14, 2009 at 1:13 am

    It is disingenuous to say I have a b c, when there is also the rest of the alphabet listed as well.

    And you are the arse for not using your real name while condemning others who do use their real name.

  5. November 14, 2009 at 1:30 am

    I do have a policy of removing blogs if necessary or someone points out specific reasons why. I haven’t seen evidence that your agenda is any more honorable then those you trash.

    • thebigotbasher
      November 14, 2009 at 1:58 am

      Sorry, can you really defend Lionheart, NoQuarter and the “Jewish Task Force”?

      All PUMAs cared about is an enemy of my enemy is my friend. From Siksind all the way down to Darra$h Murphy.

      For fuck sakes (probably for $$s sakes) she was giving support to white nationalists in the UK.

      • November 14, 2009 at 2:26 am

        I don’t visit every blog on my site nor do I defend every blog on my site. They are all their own entity. They are not all PUMA blogs either. The purpose of DailyPUMA is to be able to track newer content of primarily PUMA blogs, but there definitely are non PUMA blogs as well.

        Even PUMA’s don’t necessarily call themselves PUMA’s because they see how conservatives have infiltrated some PUMA sites.

        It is very important to get divergent points of view.

        I think NO Quarter puts out a lot of fine articles. You can cherry pick their content and find a couple of articles that you find offensive, but my recollection is that those articles are usually in response to other media forces that aren’t doing their job.

        When that happens, people can post angry topics.

        Anyways, I personally have written around 200 articles for DailyPUMA, so why you keep bringing up other blogs is puzzling.

  6. November 14, 2009 at 2:19 am

    I am very proud of my own personal columns. If the rump roasters enjoy making fun of them, then rumproasters are probably pretty heartless.

    Barack Obama is so into the banksters I kind of feel badly for you if you don’t understand or believe that. Even Arianna Huffington called Barack Obama out on his bankcentric ways.


    • thebigotbasher
      November 14, 2009 at 2:58 am

      The Huffington Post now allows the idiot Suksind to post.

      Hey I agree with the Cat Lady Christian on one thing


      • November 14, 2009 at 8:48 am

        So are you saying Barack “Jamie Dimon is my favorite wall street banker” Obama is not bankcentric?

        and Arianna Huffington wrote that piece around six months ago.

  7. thebigotbasher
    November 14, 2009 at 2:38 am

    I think NO Quarter puts out a lot of fine articles. You can cherry pick their content and find a couple of articles that you find offensive, but my recollection is that those articles are usually in response to other media forces that aren’t doing their job.

    When that happens, people can post angry topics.

    So racism, death threats and sexism from PUMA sites are just “angry topics”?

    A libertarian wearing a “Palin is a cunt” t-shirt is the fault of the Obama Presidential campaign team?

    Wow, not just double standards, PUMA standards. I have to say, I haven’t read your posts, but as you are a PUMA they will be Hillary won the “popular vote”, DNC were sexist for enforcing the rules, waah May 31st, donate to Darra$h and vote Palin.

    • November 14, 2009 at 4:19 am

      Pretty much every political blog puts out some angry content.

      I try not to use profanity when I write. I am also trying to not use the name of animals to describe behavior or actions in a derogatory way.

      Jamie Dimon is Barack Obama’s favorite Wall Street Banker. I consider Jamie Dimon to be a danger to the health of our country, both short term or long term.

      Many many many many people who support Barack Obama LOATHE Jamie Dimon.

      You figure it out.

  8. Kerry Reid
    November 14, 2009 at 6:42 am

    “Going all the way back to Alice Walker and on down the line, contesting signatures on ballots if they had even the slightest difference between the printed version and the written version.”

    Wow, I did not know that Barack Obama ever ran against the author of “The Color Purple.” Got some links on that race? Sounds like a humdinger!

    God, you are a moronic twatwaffle.

    Don’t you have people to try to convince to hand over a million dollars to you, you sad-sack shitbrained pathetic attention whore?

  9. November 14, 2009 at 8:46 am

    Alice Palmer. I thought I corrected it before I posted it.

    Enjoy. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/04/once-obamas-men.html

  10. Kerry Reid
    November 14, 2009 at 9:09 am

    Or is it that all blacks are the same to you? Isn’t that the classic PUMA line, that blacks only voted for Obama because he’s black? Of course, when the bitter white women turned to Palin, it had NOTHING to do with “vote for any vagina in a storm,” right? And of course, when blacks voted overwhelmingly for white Democrats (as they did in most national races until 2008), that was never a problem for people like the Clintons.

    Nothing illegal in what Obama did in his race against Palmer. Hardball? Sure. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/index.html

    But completely within the rules of the race. And definitely not the same fucking thing as declaring over and over again, and signing pledges, that certain primaries wouldn’t count, as Hillary did, and then crying that not counting votes in Florida was the same as oppression of voters in Zimbabwe. Not the same as trying to claim that only “big states” ought to count, or discounting caucuses that Obama won, while trumpeting the ones that Hillary won. Oh wait — did she win any caucuses? No? Maybe she should have figured out “how to win” instead of assuming that name recognition and “inevitability” would win the day.

    You’re right on one count, fuckface. It’s how Obama wins– by being smart, but staying within the rules. That is, he wins. By over 50% majority in the popular vote, which Mr. Hillary never got. By a huge electoral college landslide, despite all the dark PUMA mutterings about how the Dems were “throwing it away” on “an inadequate black male.” And how they were going to turn their “18 million strong” into a vengeful juggernaut and hand the White House to the McFailin ticket. Yeah. You showed us!

    Hillary lost. Despite all the bullshit birth certificate, ACORN, Rezko, Jeremiah Wright, Muslim-Socialist-Terrorist nonsense racist dumbass shitbirds like you tossed at Obama. She LOST. But unlike you, Hillary has moved on, because she’s not an insane pathetic troll.

    • November 14, 2009 at 9:39 pm

      We’re going to have to come up with new term to describe sexists who view everybody else as racists. You can say this was a race issue, I see it as sexism in the media and the media being bought out by Barack Obama’s money.

      I watched Olbermann on many occasions back in early 2008, I read Huffington Post, their slants against Hillary Clinton were both embarrassing and offensive.

      • thebigotbasher
        November 14, 2009 at 11:03 pm

        We’re going to have to come up with new term to describe sexists who view everybody else as racists

        Darra$h Murphy and SM77 did – PUMAs.

  11. November 14, 2009 at 9:15 am

    So first you taunt because I don’t respond, then you call me a troll.
    You seem to have anger issues.

    • November 14, 2009 at 5:58 pm

      Just pointing out the hypocrisy of accusing someone of running away, and then when they don’t run away, you call them a troll.

  12. Kerry Reid
    November 14, 2009 at 10:23 am

    I find PUMA trolls disgusting and reprehensible, though you’re hardly important enough to warrant anger, despite what your ego might desire. And how interesting that you are unable to prove that anything Obama has done in elections is contrary to the established rules — unlike Hillary signing pledges that certain states shouldn’t count, then crying when they didn’t help her out after the “inevitability” thing came a bust.

    There is a bowl of diseased cocks with your name on it. Start choking on them, you despicable racist lying asswipe.

    • November 14, 2009 at 9:40 pm

      if you believe everybody who does not like Barack Obama is a racist, then that probably makes you biggest racist of all.

      • thebigotbasher
        November 14, 2009 at 11:27 pm

        Not everyone who does not like Barack Obama is a racist, but everyone who funded Darra$h Murphy, repeated the lies of NoQuarter and ran stories attempting to link him to the Nation of Islam is.

  13. justlen
    November 14, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    Goddamn, Kerry, you rock.

  14. Kerry Reid
    November 14, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Alessandro, you puling sack of puke, you deny any responsibility for the hate sites you link to at your under-trafficked hairball. (And yeah, No Quarter is a fucking hate site, putz. “Whitey Tape?”)

    But wasn’t one of the main PUMA screaming points about Obama that he didn’t “do enough” to counter misogyny directed at Hillary? (Though of course she didn’t just NOT counter racism — she and her campaign actively encouraged it — “hardworking Americans, white Americans.”) So you’re a fucking hypocrite as well as a racist for linking to that kind of filth.

    Oh, and point out where I accused you of running away. I didn’t, shitbird. That’s in your own fevered imagination. Kinda like imagining that Obama gave Hillary the finger or played “99 Problems” at a campaign party. In fact, point out where, in this thread, ANYONE accused you of “running away.” Wanting you to eat shit and die is not the same as accusing you of running away.

    “I try not to use profanity when I write. I am also trying to not use the name of animals to describe behavior or actions in a derogatory way.”

    Oh, so it’s okay to be a racist lying hypocritical sack of shit and link to more of the same as long as you don’t use naughty words or barnyard images? It’s the IDEAS you promote that are the obscenities here, moron.

    My boot. Your ass. You must enjoy this. I’m going to have to start charging you for your masochistic fetishes.

  15. Zoobear
    November 14, 2009 at 6:21 pm

    “Just pointing out the hypocrisy of accusing someone of running away, and then when they don’t run away, you call them a troll.”

    Yeah, but you’re obviously too much of a fantasizing wuss to respond to her points or any of those any one else here has challenged you with, you useless pile of racist-promoting droning shit.

    You’ve been trolling blogs since last year and you’ve gotten nowhere. One definition of insanity is repeating a failed action over and over–but you’re an expert in fail, aren’t you? Even other PUMAs laugh at you. Not with you. Now go get a fucking life you lamebrained fucknuckle.

    • November 14, 2009 at 9:41 pm

      yeah, who.

      • thebigotbasher
        November 14, 2009 at 11:30 pm

        MyIq=2 became a PUMA because he thought it wouls be easy to get old pussy – he said it.

        Darra$h Murphy became one to make money out of bitter bigots (fair play to her).

        Why did you become one?

      • November 19, 2009 at 2:37 am

        Keith Olbermann, MSNBC, and Huffington Post turned me to Hillary Clinton.

  16. Kerry Reid
    November 14, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    You’re right, Alessandro. I make a living off my writing. You can’t give it away and are forced to troll blogs where you’re a laughingstock, BEGGING people to read your tripe.

    • November 14, 2009 at 9:22 pm

      Once again, you taunt people if they don’t respond to your posts, but if they do, then you call them trolls.

      As for being “paid” for your writing, who finances your writing? Chase Bank, Citibank, American Express?

      If you don’t have a say over who advertises by your words, are you a real writer?

  17. Zoobear
    November 14, 2009 at 11:11 pm

    “If you don’t have a say over who advertises by your words, are you a real writer?”

    If you’re such an infantile cheeseball that you can’t take RESPONSIBILITY for linking to racist assholes on your pathetic blog, you have no credibility and no room at all to criticize others.

    Even among the low-information headbangers and losers of PUMAdom, you stand out as the most pathetic excuse for a human being imaginable.

    “if you believe everybody who does not like Barack Obama is a racist, then that probably makes you biggest racist of all.”

    No, shithead. YOU link to sites linked to fascists and terrorists. Take some RESPONSIBILITY for your own actions once in your sorry excuse for a life. Fuckwit.

    • November 16, 2009 at 4:13 am

      I found this youtube video on lion heart.

      I found the youtube video very powerful. It exposes the Sharia.
      Lionheart just posts the video, they aren’t even enabling comments, just letting people watch the video.

      I was impressed with most of what Anjem Choudary had to say, until near the end where he kind of goes over the top after being so even keeled prior, and basically admits that muslims should try and recruit all others to the muslim faith, even if they have to die trying.

      I have noticed a pattern to much of your anger. You choose to focus all of your anger on exact words being said by the side you disagree with, without acknowledging that they were motivated to those words by something that has already occurred.

      You try and make it sound like the comments you quote are the initiating volley when they are actually a response to other equally controversial statements made in opposition.

      • thebigotbasher
        November 17, 2009 at 11:36 am

        You are a freakin idiot.

        All that motivates the likes of lionheart, noquarter and Darra$h Murphy is hate and greed.

  18. thebigotbasher
    November 14, 2009 at 11:33 pm

    I will say Kerry and Zoobear have ripped Machi a new one.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: